NEW - Étude : les dirigeants français & LinkedIn

Expertise
Map of the U.S. election on TikTok, by Florent Lefebvre

Clémence Hutinet
Marketing Manager

@ClemenceHutinet

Beyond traditional media, the American election was widely relayed on social networks. Among the platforms used by both candidates for the White House: TikTok. In fact, Donald Trump posted his first video on the platform last June.

How was the American election approached on TikTok? And which community stands out more, Democrats or Republicans? Analysis by Florent Lefebvre, a social data expert, with Visibrain.

Understanding the U.S. election on TikTok through mapping

Maps of the U.S. Election

cartographie 1

methode

cartographie 2

cartographie 3

chatgpt

U.S. Election on TikTok: Republicans are ahead of Democrats

Two major media poles are in opposition: one leans toward Democrats (in green) and the other toward Republicans (in red).

However, Republicans have two advantages:

  • Their community is more densely connected, meaning that their audience is highly shared across channels. This creates a “funnel effect” in the algorithm—someone watching the Daily Mail is likely to see Fox News suggested, and someone watching Fox News is likely to be shown content featuring Donald Trump. This effect is much less pronounced among green (Democratic-leaning) channels, where each channel has a more exclusive audience. They share fewer viewers, so there’s a lower chance that one channel will be suggested to another in the same community

  • Additionally, even the larger media outlets in the Democratic (green) cluster receive a majority of pro-Trump comments. Only the numerous smaller green channels on the periphery of the network give this community an overall pro-Kamala Harris sentiment

To illustrate, here is ChatGPT’s analysis of comments on six major English-language media outlets on TikTok:

  • Daily Mail: “Trump is the most supported candidate among these responses, with enthusiastic support for his campaign compared to more reserved support for Harris.”

  • NBC News: “Trump has clear majority support in these comments, while mentions of Kamala Harris are often dismissive, skeptical, or outright negative.”

  • MSNBC: “Trump appears to have slightly more vocal support in these responses, though Harris also has a dedicated group of supporters stressing the importance of a ‘blue wave.’”

  • Fox News: “Trump is clearly the most supported candidate here, as shown by a high volume of comments in his favor and criticism of Harris.”

  • CNN: “Trump is the favored candidate among these responses. Many comments support him explicitly, with recurring emphasis on his correctness and perceived media bias against him.”

  • BBC News: “Trump is the most supported candidate here by a significant margin, with comments heavily favoring his victory and mocking Harris and her supporters.”

  • Billboard: “Trump is the favored candidate among these responses, with a strongly negative tone toward Harris. Her campaign’s association with celebrities is criticized, with clear preference for Trump in this sample.”

It is interesting to note that many of these comments are pro-Trump despite being posted on channels generally positioned against him. This conflict between comments and media, as well as celebrity endorsements in videos, even becomes an argument in itself: “There’s a strong sense of cynicism toward celebrity political endorsements, with comments suggesting these endorsements are inauthentic, insincere, or financially motivated.”

Except for the blue community (official support accounts of Kamala Harris), all other community comments follow the same trend: they are either divided or clearly pro-Trump.

Among notable non-English-speaking communities, Spanish-speaking channels are particularly active on this topic. Analyzing their comments reveals a clear advantage for Donald Trump, which aligns with voting trends showing Trump gaining 14% more support among Hispanic Americans compared to the previous election.

The orange and pink communities are harder to categorize. They consist mostly of personal accounts, with few media outlets or public figures, and many small channels that have gained traction with just a handful of viral (and non-political) videos.

Reaching these communities has the advantage of engaging people who don’t typically consume political content on TikTok. However, they won’t drive the conversation: their followers aren’t interested in politics, and TikTok’s recommendation algorithm does not recognize political content as relevant to them.